When we think about the different stock-market analysis types, we usually think about (or we were told) two: fundamental and technical analysis.
It is true that these two are different enough to make a distinction in two types, but allow me to add one more element to the comparison, the bias component. This would leave us unifying these two analyses and discovering a new one: the qualitative analysis.
We begin with the classical comparison of the different analysis types.
The fundamental analysis obtains information from business results, macroeconomic data and sectorial perspectives. With all these, it tries to obtain inversion decisions in those markets and assets that considers are undervalued according to its real price.
Fundamentals inversion example:
Firm X from the energy sector has published a growth of 40%respect the previous year, much better than the other firms in the sector. Analyzing the PER’s company and knowing that governments usually support this kind of enterprise, I consider that it is a good opportunity to buy shares of the firm X, with a sales projection in the next 4-5 years.
In the technical analysis, however, part of the premise is that price discounts everything. That is all the information known until today, business results, macro data, etc. The actual price is considering all of this. The inversion decision with the technical analysis resides in analyzing the price graphs, the indicators and price patterns.
Firm X has returned to the price of 10€ a share. In the last 3 years, every time that has reached this level there has been a ricochet in the price, making a strong support line. Considering that the price of the indexes is getting back to bullish trends, and considering that it is a good opportunity to buy shares from firm X at 10€, with a sales projection almost arriving at the next resistance to 12€ in the following months.
Although there is quite an argument between one analysis type and the other, the truth is that they are two different ways of seeing reality.
There are traders that even combine both analyses: they use the fundamental analysis to conduct a global analysis to decide in which market/sector takes a stance, and the technical analysis to define the convenient moment and price.
Nevertheless, talking about realities, these two types of analysis have a common factor: the bias condition. That is, two fundamental expert analysts with experience can make contradictory inversion decisions with the same information.
The same can happen with technical analysis.
For example, a price that zigzags:
While some technical analysts can appreciate a bullish tendency that encourages them to make buying decisions, others can expect bearish tendencies due to the present one.
The main characteristic of the quantitative analysis is that it is 100% objective. A quantitative analyst defines a trading strategy and it would be always known for certain rules based on technical indicators that are going to be made by mathematics equations.
In the end, this characteristic attributes its three intrinsic advantages:
Here you have a summary table of the three (and not two) analysis types:
So remember, when someone tells you that there is two stock-market analysis let them know that quantitative analysis also exists, and with tradeEAsy is now accessible to any trader.
If you have any doubt, you can write us here.
Singup in tradEAsy to try our platform.If you are ready, become a premium!